Analyze and evaluate Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Analyze and evaluate - Essay ExampleEvidently, the two queries differ in the sense that one ought to be responded to by virtue of proving the existence of God while the second already holds the truth of Gods existence yet seeks resolution concerning how Gods qualities whitethorn or may not suit the act of deception. On this ground, it follows that the two proofs of Gods existence argon necessarily variant. To analyze how the synthesis of one proof is distinct from that of the other, in the process, one would be commensurate to figure that besides Gods existence, the properties associated with the existing entity, being supreme and infinite in nature, mustiness be utilized to affirm a congruous proposition that God cannot be a deceiver. concord to Descartes ontological argument stating The mere Idea of God, proves Gods existence (Descartes First Proof, Med. tierce) -- God, being a concept, is sufficient proof in itself of His existence and this may be found to acquire strong hol d back from the unshakeable truth I think therefore I am (Med. II) for with this conclusion is the knowledge of the fact that the sharp-witted capacity of an individual attests to his being and the natural ability to rationalize as such is not without assess or consequence so that what is conceived exists as well. Thus, the notion of God in the mind is all that it takes to attest the truth that God does exist though no material or concrete evidence is perceived. Descartes, however, tho explicates because I cannot conceive anything but God to whose essence existence necessarily pertains (Descartes Argument in Med. V) and that By the name God, I understand a substance infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, all-knowing, all-powerful (Med. III 22 23). In addition, hence, Descartes acknowledge herein that the encompassing presence of God entails the presence of attributes preconceived or known prior in reference to God on the basis of which, he manages to validate that throug h Gods perfection, the mind of Gods infinity must have been something implanted by God himself (Med. III38) for Descartes argues I should not, however, have the idea of an infinite substance, seeing I am a finite being (Med. III23). Apparently, Descartes needed the two proofs of Gods existence to be able to substantiate a impenetrable claim that it is not possible for God to deceive the philosopher despite his finite limits and weakness as a rational human being. Having realized that God is perfect occurs equivalent to having arrived at the thought that deception may only come from the absolute opposite of perfection which is imperfection (Med. III). Both proofs are of equal meaning for in the event God could not be proven to exist, it is useless to find out the likelihood that he is a deceiver and similarly, it makes no sense to justify Gods existence unsocial for this would readily demand investigation of what he is made of in finer details. Rather than operating from different aspects, independent of each other, they function hand in hand to strengthen one anothers validity and worth. Secondly, does Descartes give a satisfactory account of human error, given a perfect and predict creator? Are Descartes arguments convincing, or does it still seem unnecessary and less than perfect that God created us with flaws? Descartes finds error is virtually a moral failing, the willful exercise of my powers of believing in excess of my